Understanding the roots of our political system often means looking far back in time. The ancient Roman statesman Marcus Tullius Cicero (106–43 BCE) offers important ideas about republicanism that resonate with today’s democratic experiment in the United States. We’ll explore how Cicero’s republican vision links with modern democracy, highlight tensions, and draw actionable lessons for Americans.
What did Cicero mean by “republicanism”?
Cicero uses the Latin term res publica to describe a political community. For him, it was not simply rule by the people, but one where citizens share rule, law, and virtue. Scholars note that for Cicero,
“To be fully human is to be free, and to be free is a consenting partner in a political community that is just and at liberty to set its own course.”
Cambridge University Press & Assessment+1
One core quote:
“In a republic this rule ought to be observed: that the majority should not have the predominant power.” Goodreads+1
This shows that Cicero worried about majoritarian tyranny. True republican government includes rights and law, protecting citizens even from the will of the majority.
Another quote:
“True law is right reason in agreement with nature; it is of universal application, unchanging and everlasting…” Goodreads+1
Here you see Cicero’s grounding of political legitimacy in nature and reason, rather than raw power.
Key elements in Cicero’s republicanism
-
Consent and common interest. Cicero argues the political community is built “by legal consent and community of interest.”
-
Rule of law, not rulers. The law applies to everyone. Philosophy of right reason matters. (See quote above.)
-
Mixed regime and balance. Cicero favours a blend of elements: popular assemblies, aristocratic oversight, and magistrates, to prevent tyranny of any singular class.
-
Citizen virtue and public spirit. Citizenship is more than voting—it is engagement in the common good, in Cicero’s view.
What does “modern democracy” mean in the U.S. context?
In the U.S., democracy primarily means government by the people via free elections, rights protections, and rule of law. The founding generation blended republican ideals with liberal rights, and over time the system has evolved.
Recent state of U.S. democracy
-
Voter turnout in the 2020 U.S. presidential election reached about 66 % of the eligible population, the highest national rate since 1900.
-
Satisfaction with how U.S. democracy is functioning is low: about 28 % of U.S. adults say they are satisfied with the way democracy is working.
These trends raise questions about legitimacy, civic inclusion, and governance.
Where Cicero meets modern democracy — and where they diverge
Alignment: Consent, rights, law
Cicero’s stress on consent and law aligns with modern democratic ideals. For example, his assertion that the state must exist to serve the community and protect citizens’ freedom resonates with U.S. constitutional design. His idea that “the welfare of the people shall be the supreme law” ― salus populi suprema lex esto ― underpins modern democratic norms.
Modern democracy also emphasises the rights of individuals: free speech, property rights, due process—concepts with roots in Cicero’s natural-law reasoning.
Tension: Majority rule vs. minority rights
Cicero warned that majority rule, without legal constraints, risks becoming tyrannical. In contrast, many modern democracies prioritise majority decisions through elections. The U.S. has mechanisms (checks and balances, courts) but still grapples with minority protection vs. majority will.
Tension: Citizen virtue vs. mass democracy
Cicero imagined an engaged citizen-elite practising virtue. Modern democracy is far more mass-based and egalitarian. That shift means: more people participate—but also the risk of populist surges, factionalism, and weaker civic bonds. Some critics argue modern democracy lacks the moral depth Cicero deemed necessary.
Tension: Size and scale
Rome was much smaller and more homogeneous compared to the modern United States. Cicero’s model assumes face-to-face citizen relationships and shared culture. Scaling to 330 million Americans changes dynamics: representation, anonymity, complexity.
Why studying Cicero republicanism matters for U.S. democracy
1. A reminder of law before power
Cicero’s insistence that law is right reason reminds us that democracy must be more than elections. It must protect individuals from arbitrary power. This is critical in times when institutions are distrusted.
2. Guarding against majoritarian tyranny
Modern democracies must protect minority rights. Cicero’s caution about majority power teaches that winning elections isn’t enough; how power is exercised matters. The U.S. system of separation of powers, judicial review, and rights protections can be read as aligning with this insight.
3. Encouraging civic virtue
Cicero believed citizens must act with public spirit. In the U.S., the growing disengagement and low satisfaction signal a civic problem: democracy thrives when citizens feel ownership and responsibility. Civic education, local engagement, and community-based politics strengthen the link.
4. Reflection on scale, community and identity
Cicero’s model forces us to ask: can a republic built for small-scale communities work for large, diverse societies? The U.S. needs structures that create meaningful connection, trust, and deliberation despite size. Examples include local governance, civic associations, or digital forums.
Practical lessons for Americans today
- Strengthen norms of reasoned deliberation rather than mere shouting. Cicero believed open-forum discussion mattered.
- Preserve legal protections for individuals, especially when the majoritarian will runs strong.
- Foster citizen engagement beyond voting: local councils, community boards, public service.
- Build institutions of civic connection: civic education, town halls, neighbourhood groups.
- Recognise the importance of virtue—not in a moralising sense but as the ability to act responsibly as citizen.
FAQs
Q1: Who was Cicero and why is he relevant today?
A: Marcus Tullius Cicero was a Roman statesman, lawyer, philosopher, and writer (106–43 BCE). His writings on law, virtue, and the republic influenced Enlightenment thinkers and via them modern democratic systems. For example, his idea that liberty requires citizen participation under law still matters.
Q2: What is republicanism in Cicero’s sense?
A: It means government by the people in a community where citizens share in rule, respect law, and act with virtue. He emphasised consent, mixed government, rule of law, and the common good.
Q3: Does Cicero’s model fit modern democracy?
A: Partly. Cicero gives a normative ideal: law, consent, citizen virtue. Modern democracy inherits these, but scale, diversity, and institutional complexity create new challenges. The tension lies between his ideal and real-world democratic practice.
Q4: What are some statistics that show U.S. democracy is strained?
A: In the 2020 U.S. presidential election, ~66 % of eligible voters turned out – the highest national rate in more than a century. Also, only around 28 % of American adults say they are satisfied with how democracy is working.
Q5: What actionable steps can citizens take inspired by Cicero?
A: Engage locally (city councils, school boards); educate yourself about rights and law; foster discussion with others respectfully; support institutions that safeguard individual protections; vote thoughtfully, not just routinely.
Bottom Line
Studying Cicero republicanism reveals deep roots of modern democracy. While our U.S. model differs in scale and context, the core ideas—law over power, citizen participation, mixed rule, rights protection—remain vital. Democracy isn’t simply voting; it is a culture of civic virtue, respect for law, and shared responsibility. By reviving these principles, Americans can deepen the promise of democracy for our era.